![]() Unlike Lightroom, Photos does not presume that detected faces are unique. This tends to mean that face recognition proceeds by which faces the user thinks are most important. To establish your Faces collection, you have to put names on faces in a frame where faces have been detected. It is not even engineered to do anything with folders except display them if that’s how photos were imported.įace recognition in Photos is incremental and behind the scenes: it only finds faces when you are not actively using the program, and over time, it batches up groups of pictures which you confirm or deny as a named person in your Faces collection. Think of it as your iPhone application on steroids. Something like Photos is designed to group pictures, more or less automatically, around people, events, dates, or geography. The problem is that different software has different competencies. From a time standpoint, they may be your only choice. Then what? Face recognition features in software may be your best bet. But say you have tens of thousands of pictures of family members and want to print a chronological photo album. The most macabre application, of course, is the funeral collage. ![]() ![]() If you are a high-volume imaging-type person, you’ve probably wondered how to deal with things like tagging people. ![]() So here is a question: what’s the best way to catalogue and tag your pictures? Is it Lightroom Classic? Lightroom Cloud? Is it Apple Photos? Is it something else? Maybe it’s a lot of things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |